After listening to the positions of the defense of the victim and the accused, the delegate of the Attorney General’s Office and the Prosecutor’s Office regarding the origin of a measure of deprivation of liberty of a preventive nature against Blessd and Dímelo Jarathe municipal criminal judge 17 with guarantee control function even did not make a decision after 10 hours of hearing.
Around 5 p.m. this afternoon June 12the togada decided suspend the hearing of imposition of a security measure whose accused procedural subjects are Stiven Mesa Londoño and Santiago Jaramillo Morán, known internationally as Blessd and Dímelo Jarain addition to Laura Moreno Restrepo and Julián David Giraldo Arboleda, for the alleged kidnapping for ransom of which Andrés Felipe Sánchez would have been a victim, the Ozuna impersonator.
The hearing this Friday started at six in the morningresuming the diligence that had been interrupted at 2 in the afternoon on Thursday in which the four individuals linked to the process were accused of the crime of aggravated attenuated extortionate kidnapping.
READ ALSO
Hearing to impose an insurance measure against Blessd and Dímelo Jara. Photo:THE TIME.
From the beginning of the proceedings and after the judge called the roll call, the prosecutor Piedad Estela Mendoza Hinojosa was credited with the use of the word to present the arguments on which it would support the request for a measure of security deprivation of liberty against Blessed, Dímelo Jara, lawyer Laura Moreno and Julián Giraldo.
For this request, the prosecutor not only referred to the complaint made by the Ozuna impersonator and what was revealed exclusively by EL TIEMPObut also brought up due to its legal relevance a second case that is ongoing against Blessd and Dímelo Jara.
It is a complaint for kidnapping, personal injuries and death threats presented by El Goldo, the manager of Cali rapper Pirloby events that would have taken place in 2024 in a residence in Las Palmas after Blessd and Pirlo would have participated in the recording of the music video for the song ‘WYA: Yellow’.
READ ALSO
Pirlo and Blessd Photo:Ig: Pirlo and Blessd
Specifically, in the complaint filed with the Attorney General’s Office For the Cali people, they point to Blessd, Dímelo Jara and other members of his work team, in addition to several armed men who were hoodedif there are locked in one of the rooms of the luxurious mansion where the video clip was recorded.
In that room, the complainants claim to have been held, beaten, threatened; They also indicate that there would have been stripped of cell phonesthey would have forced to reveal your passwords to check their phones and they would also have took blood samples.
The sum of the complaints that are current against Blessd and Dímelo Jara were the argumentative basis used by the prosecutor Mendoza to request the municipal criminal judge 17 with a guarantee control function of Medellín that would impose measure of deprivation of liberty in a prison to the accused.
The prosecutor’s intervention spread for something more than four hours. Once the presentation of the elements was concluded, the judge granted, one by one, the use of the floor to the participants. defense of the four accused.
He first lawyer in taking the word was Andres Arangohe defender of Blessd.
Specifically, the jurist stated in his speech that the The Prosecutor’s Office did not present a single piece of evidence. that would allow establishing that the singer was the determiner of the crime of aggravated extortionate kidnapping.
For his part, the criminal lawyer Santiago Trespalacios, defender of Dímelo Jaraused his space to explain that the Prosecutor’s Office had built a case about a behavior that had not been configured, pointing out that in their testimonies the Ozuna impersonator did not prove that he had been kidnapped but until a few weeks ago, four years after having presented his first sworn statement. Trespalacios pointed out that the correct conduct to judge, after proving the reasonable inference that the events contrary to the law reported by the Ozuna impersonator actually occurred, is that of unlawful restraint.
The lawyers of Laura Moreno and Julián Giraldo They stated that their clients had a minimal role in the episode and that since 2022 they have shown absolute disposition with the administration of justice.
READ ALSO
Blessd during the hearing for the imposition of the security measure. Photo:THE TIME.
All the lawyers agreed in asking the judge to no measure of security deprivation of liberty is imposed against their clients, and that, if a decision of that kind was determined, the defenders asked the togada to be a non-custodial security measure.
After concluding all the interventions, a few minutes before 5 in the afternoon, the municipal criminal judge 17 with warranty control function adjourned the hearing for evaluate all the evidentiary elements close to the lawyers of the procedural subjects added to the interventions carried out during the proceedings.
In that sense, the togada will issue its decision he next Tuesday June 16 at 7 in the morning.
NICOLAS TAMAYO ESCALANTE
Journalist from Nación, in Medellín.
