Sentences ranging from 3 years to acquittal in the Bir Murad Rais Court
The Bir Mourad Rais Court issued its rulings against the defendants involved in a corruption file that affected the sports training sector, in which executives at the Higher School of Sports Sciences and Technology in Dali Ibrahim in Algiers were being followed, ranging from 3 years in prison to acquittal.
In the details of the rulings pronounced by the misdemeanor judge at the Bir Mourad Rais Court, on Sunday, June 28, she imposed a 3-year prison sentence and a fine of 100,000 Algerian dinars against the main accused in the case file, called “B.A,” the former director of studies at the school.
Obligating those convicted to pay an amount of 200 thousand dinars to both the victim and the treasury
In return, the judge imposed a two-year effective imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 Algerian dinars against the head of the technology and sports training department at the school, the accused, “A.M.Sh.”
While the judge’s rulings passed calmly and peacefully for the rest of the defendants in the case file, and the matter concerns “R.B”, in charge of running the school’s work, along with the head of the schooling department, “Z.B”, and “D.M”, in charge of the Sub-Directorate of Studies, as they benefited from complete acquittal of all the charges against them, while the person in charge of schooling, “Z. Jamal”, was summoned as a witness in the case case and not an accused.
On the other hand, the court issued a ruling requiring the defendants to pay an amount of 200,000 Algerian dinars to the victim, “Zeinab B,” as compensation for the material and moral harm inflicted on her, in exchange for the same amount that the convicts in the case file pay to the public treasury as compensation for the damages.
They appeared before the court for incidents of corruption related to transgressions and violations of joining the rank of sports advisor for the benefit of elite and high-level athletes and obtaining financial positions, such as falsifying the score sheet, fictitious grades, and a fake list in all subjects, with the disappearance of a number of files, in addition to failure to respect the usual procedural stages such as programming exams, writing evaluation cards, convening the professors’ council, and handing over papers.
The defendants were charged with charges ranging from a misdemeanor of abusing one’s position by performing work within the framework of exercising one’s duties in a manner that violates laws and regulations for the purpose of obtaining undue benefits for another person, two misdemeanors of forgery and using forged documents in administrative documents, acts stipulated and punishable under the text of Article 33 of the Law on Preventing and Combating Corruption 01/06 and Article 22 of the Law on Combating Forgery and the Use of Forgers.
