resident Prabowo Subianto’s flagship free nutritious meals program to combat stunting and malnutrition has faced intense public scrutiny since its launch early last year, owing to what many view as an overly ambitious target of reaching nearly 83 million students and pregnant women nationwide, as well as its massive budget allocation.
This year’s budget was initially set at Rp 335 trillion (US$18.65 billion) before being reduced to Rp 268 trillion to improve efficiency and sharpen targeting, amid reports that some beneficiaries, particularly from middle-income households, had rejected the program over concerns about food quality, nutritional value and safety.
Adding to those concerns, the Indonesian Education Monitoring Network (JPPI) reported that more than 37,000 students nationwide experienced food poisoning after consuming meals distributed through the program between January 2025 and May 2026.
The initiative has also been tainted by allegations of budget markups and corruption, with the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) detaining and naming three former leaders of the National Nutrition Agency (BGN), which administers the program, as suspects just a day after they were removed from their positions on June 2.
These developments have exposed the risks of prioritizing rapid expansion over sound governance and quality control. While the objective of improving children’s nutrition and reducing stunting remains commendable, the government must acknowledge that a program of this scale cannot be judged solely by the number of beneficiaries it reaches.
Upon being appointed BGN head on June 8, former deputy head for public communications and investigation Nanik S. Deyang pledged to improve the program’s governance by prioritizing budget efficiency and service quality over simply expanding the number of beneficiaries.
Every Thursday
The shift signals a departure from President Prabowo’s emphasis on rapid expansion. On several occasions, the President has lauded the program’s growth, citing its ability to reach 55 million beneficiaries within a year, compared with Brazil’s school feeding program, which took 11 years to serve 40 million recipients. Yet the success of such a nutrition program should not be measured by the speed or scale of its rollout, but by its ability to improve outcomes among those who need intervention the most.
