No sooner had the people of the land of Marrakesh finished the “Acnouchian” or “Don Quixote” era, which brought them back to carrying firewood for cooking and heating, than the firewood carrier descended upon them, with its bone and fat, to move them from gray to black and from doubt to certainty.
Her name is Fatah Al-Zahraa Mansouri. Nothing distinguishes her biography other than her being the daughter of a former ambassador to the United Arab Emirates, and her friendships with the Jewish community in the country of Marrakesh, to the point that she would ask them to pray for her, because she believed in their blessings. It was a “achievement” that congratulations were showered upon her from the Hebrew state and the Jews of the world, who may have become certain that the entity located in the Middle East is no longer alone, but rather has a twin in the north of the African continent.
The people of Marrakesh are suffering from social difficulties, which are increasing from day to day, and all the economic achievements that the Makhzen is proud of in the worlds of tourism, sports and agriculture are subject to moral and ideological concessions. The country of Marrakesh is no longer mentioned, except in conjunction with espionage, drugs, bribery and moral decadence, before the people of Marrakesh themselves became aware of the reality of the powerful Jewish lobby, which toasted the appointment of the so-called Fatima Zahraa Mansouri, as Prime Minister to succeed Aziz. Akhannouch, who was at least… a businessman.
The people of Marrakesh suffer from a lot of frustration and poverty, between non-existent freedom and the rise in the prices of all necessities. Perhaps the flight of more than thirty thousand people in one day to the city of Ceuta is a historical cry on which the regime and the people could have built a freedom project, whether long-term or short-term, that will be achieved.
Al-Makhzen convinced his people that he was free and could criticize the prime minister and his ministerial formation as he wished, and just as he had a margin of “freedom”, in which he flogged Aziz Akhannouch without taking them to heart. He could criticize Fatima Al-Zahra, because he was certain that the people’s condition would not change, and indeed he would not be able to avoid further downfall, and to blame the prime minister for all the problems afflicting the kingdom, which was preoccupied with the desert issue and foreign relations waiting for someone to defeat it. “With Twitter and its sisters” in its lost cause.
In major crises, government changes only mean an extension of the crisis, especially if everyone knows the source of the crisis.
The biggest problem is that these changes turn into an injection, for anesthesia and dyeing, and whenever people are in pain, we add blood to them, without removing the malignant tumor.
The image marketed abroad is a popular election, in which people exercised their “freedom” to choose the man or woman who will run their new government, and the loser’s admission of his loss, and a popular welcome for a woman who is said to lead the country on the right track towards further growth, but the truth or the hidden image is well known to everyone at home and abroad. Neither Aziz ruled and failed, nor Fatima Al-Zahra will rule and fail, for the real ruler is there… Excuse me, the real rulers here and there, Between the Elysee and Abu Dhabi and of course the Knesset.
