From San Marino information – The site EUalivean international site notoriously close to the Bulgarian investor who attempted to take over BSM, returns to cover San Marino, and does so starting from the investigation into the alleged money laundering linked to Titan Games. It does so by placing emphasis on the framework of legal overlaps and on the topic of the professional roles of lawyers who operate between public companies, banks and financial institutions. EUalive reports that Titan Games she made use of lawyers Ermanno Cappa, Matteo Mularoni And Marco Valli in two administrative proceedings against theFinancial Information Agency (Aif). The appeals concerned a sanction dated May 2023 and a provision dated November of the same year, under the anti-money laundering legislation. Already in this case the short circuit appears evident with a state company that is in conflict with a state body. The site’s attention, then, focuses above all on the lawyers of the parties in dispute, on the lawyer Matteo Mularoni, whose name appears in various positions in the San Marino financial and public system. The lawyer, the site always reports, has assisted the Bank of San Marino and other banks and was part of the Board of Directors of the Central Bank in the past, as well as holding professional roles linked to the operation desired by the State on the securitization of impaired loans, the recovery of NPLs, in short. EUalive also goes back to past events and notes that his name also appears in the story Black Kingthe investigation into money transfers between Italy and San Marino through Asset Banca. In that proceeding, the site reports, Mularoni was subjected to investigation and his position was archived. However, the transcripts of some conversations with the institute’s managers were discussed in court. EUalive also recalls the role of Marco Valli, who in addition to his forensic activity would carry out notarial functions for Giochi del Titano, and that of Tania Ercolanilawyer of the general director Salvatore Caroniabut already legal CBSM in other proceedings. The header EUalive specifies that the overlapping of roles does not in itself demonstrate conflicts of interest. The question raised rather concerns transparency and checks on possible incompatibilities or inopportunities, in a system in which the same professionals find themselves working for public and private entities who can place themselves in antagonistic positions.
