Minors’ access to the internet requires a response that goes beyond prohibitions and technological resources. Andorra Telecom’s new tariff without mobile data is a useful initiative to gradually introduce children to telephony, but it cannot be presented as an effective barrier to social networks. Any device connected to a Wi-Fi network keeps the door open to the same contents and risks. This reality shows that digital protection cannot be solved with a limitation of the telephone contract. The bill that restricts access to certain platforms to those under the age of sixteen represents a necessary step to recognize the dangers associated with inappropriate content, addictive behaviors and invasion of privacy. However, their effectiveness will depend on how the affected platforms are defined, age verification systems and the ability to monitor compliance. Passing a ban that can be easily circumvented would only create a false sense of security. It would also be a mistake to shift all the responsibility to families, who often have to deal with a complex and changing digital environment without sufficient tools and knowledge. Operators must facilitate accessible and free checks, administrations must promote digital education and parents must accompany their children with criteria adapted to each age. Supervision cannot be confused with indiscriminate surveillance, because adolescents also have the right to privacy and to develop their autonomy. It is necessary to establish understandable limits, explain the risks and encourage habits that avoid dependence on screens. Technology offers educational and social opportunities that it would be foolish to deny, but it also requires shared responsibilities. The challenge is not to prevent minors from knowing the internet, but to get them to access it with guarantees, maturity and protection. Ambitious legislation will only be useful if it is translated into enforceable measures and sustained educational commitment.
